From: Bill Klein (bill_at_[hidden])
Date: 1999-11-09 22:12:43
>If operator== were defined in the boost library as a non-member
>template, then you could specialize it for your particular type
>to give it the semantics you want when you need them. Would that
>satisfy your concerns?
Yes, I think that sounds like a good compromise. Is
there any disadvantage to doing it this way?
-Bill Klein <bill_at_[hidden]>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk