From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-28 12:24:27
Ian Bruntlett wrote:
> > Dave Abrahams wrote:
> > >I just happened to take a look at the docs for the random library,
> > >and the fact that we are documenting things we're putting in the
> > >detail namespace hit me like a cold slap in the face ;\
> > >
> > >I thought detail was supposed to be reserved for implementation
> > >details of no interest to users...?
> Surely its of interest to people porting the library?
A I see it the templated classes for RNGs in the
detail namespace are of interest to people
implementing additional RNGs, but not to people
just using the library. A documentation thus
seems to be appropriate, but maybe we can have it
separated from the rest of the documentation?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk