Re: [boost] cloning smart pointer [was re any]

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-01 06:30:04

Kevlin Henney wrote:

 >(1) Should we reopen the case for (or against) a cloning pointer? IIRC
 >there was some discussion on this earlier this year / late last year,
 >and then it fizzled out.

I, for one, haven't forgotten copy and/or cloning pointers.  I'd like to 
include them in my smart pointer generator experiments before Toronto.

--Beman