From: James Curran/MVP (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-07 07:30:00
Why be vague? namespace boost::internal_use_only.
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:40:54 -0700
From: Gary Powell <Gary.Powell_at_[hidden]>
Subject: namespace "details"
Now that there are several boost libraries which have "details" namespaces
should we be using a namespace with less possible collisions? i.e.
ggcl_details? any_details?, lambda_details? vtl_details?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk