Re: [boost] Fw: A reminder for dlw_oprs.zip

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-07 17:13:22

A question about the "archetypes". These classes are
just more operator bundles, right? 

I'll be using the term "archetype" in the concept checking
library (and in a paper describing concept checking) to mean
something quite different: a minimalistic class that *models* a concept.

I think it would be good to keep the terminology separate.

Cheers,

Jeremy

On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, David Abrahams wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> To: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 12:58 AM
> Subject: Re: A reminder for dlw_oprs.zip
> 
> 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> > 
> > > Whoops!  Is the middle _e_ silent?  (Is the word still pronounced
> > > "arch-type," like I thought, or is it "arch-e-type?")
> > 
> > I believe ish "arch-uh-type".
> > 
> > dish-ish-making-me-dizzy-ly y'rs,
> > dave
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek                        www: http://www.lsc.nd.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Candidate                  email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 Univ. of Notre Dame         work phone: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------------------