From: Gary Powell (Gary.Powell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-04 16:50:45
> This means to me that we could (non-portably for the moment)
> specialize auto_ptr on X and give it the desired semantics without
> worrying about changing the behavior of existing working code.
At first glance this looks cool. It appears to be a minor change to the
standard and would extend std::auto_ptr<> in a predictable way.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk