From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-29 08:20:50
At 07:11 PM 1/27/2001 -0500, David Abrahams wrote:
>The other thing I love about BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT() is that don't need to
>remember to write checks differently based on context, wheras the concept
>checking lib has boost_function_requires<>() and BOOST_CLASS_REQUIRES().
I've argued that there should at least be a BOOST_FUNCTION_REQUIRES() macro
so the usage would be somewhat more uniform.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk