From: Dan Nuffer (dnuffer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-02-16 18:07:01
> --- In boost_at_y..., Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_g...> wrote:
> > Dan Nuffer wrote:
> > > I write a file called boost.spec which contains instructions to
> RPM on
> > > how to build and install boost.
> > I'd like to add the boost.spec file to the CVS as a first step
> > a build system, if it's sufficiently generic.
> Why? RPMs are hardly portable. The Win32 platform (among others)
> won't know a thing about the .spec extension or file type and can do
> nothing with this. autoconf is more portable, and even that leaves
> Windows high and dry for the most part.
> I'm all for getting something together for a first step towards a
> build system, but I don't think this is it.
> Bill Kempf
Of course. RPM is not a build system. It's a packaging/installation
system. Similar to Microsoft's MSI technology. I think it would be
pretty cool if boost had an MSI package for Windows users.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk