Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-24 15:36:26

Next message: Wayne Miller: "A proposal for a fully-portable reader-writer lock"
Previous message: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] Re: About crc.zip, version 15"
In reply to: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] TODAY: Math Constants library formal review starts"
Next in thread: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] TODAY: Math Constants library formal review starts"
Reply: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] TODAY: Math Constants library formal review starts"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul A. Bristow" <pbristow_at_[hidden]>

> I think we will provide math functions (hopefully soon - see NIST proposal
> http://dlmf.nist.gov) so do we stuff future math functions in the same
> namespace math?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other views please!?!

Can't we decide that if and when we get to providing those math functions?

-Dave

Next message: Wayne Miller: "A proposal for a fully-portable reader-writer lock"
Previous message: Doug Gregor: "Re: [boost] Re: About crc.zip, version 15"
In reply to: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] TODAY: Math Constants library formal review starts"
Next in thread: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] TODAY: Math Constants library formal review starts"
Reply: Paul A. Bristow: "RE: [boost] TODAY: Math Constants library formal review starts"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk