From: Anthony Williams (anthony_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-30 05:25:13
--- In boost_at_y..., "joel de guzman" <joel_at_i...> wrote:
> I am having second thoughts with the + operator for
> sequencing. At first, it seems to be ok but further
> use of the operator gives me a feeling that something
> is wrong.
> Possible substitutes:
> a >> b >> c... The original Spirit syntax. >> arrows denote
> a / b / c ... Non-commutative. Similar to unix file paths and URLs
> a % b % c... Non-commutative. A bit of an eye-sore though
How about overloading the comma operator, so
works as expected?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk