Date: 2001-06-27 17:15:23
> > I believe that Foo::operator= will never be considered because its name is
> > hidden by Bar::operator=.
> > -Brad
> I can't believe I missed that... It appears that the 'thin wrapper' approach
> of 'function' is becoming very, very fat.
It's easy to miss this, since compilers like g++ and MSVC don't give any sort of
indication that base method is hidden. I recently created a hiding bug and we
only uncovered it after a port to the Solaris compiler which pointed it out the
hidden method with a warning....
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk