Boost.Threads - Questions

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-20 08:10:17

> [1] No atomic_t, why? A noncopyable thread needs shared_ptr, and
shared_ptr
> needs atomic_t for thread safe reference count updates; it seems that
> atomic_t is at the same level as boost::thread. Of course I can hack my
own
> shared_ptr using Interlocked*, but this rather defeats the purpose

http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3AFA6932.4EADD8BB%40web.de
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3B016AF0.5E55E7A1%40web.de

regards,
alexander.