Re: [boost] Boost config mini-review

From: Ed Brey (edbrey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-08-27 08:27:03

From: "Darin Adler" <darin_at_[hidden]>

[Testing under VC6.]
> >> boost_no_mem_tem_keyword.cxx has an interferenced formal parameter.  This
> >> should be removed to prevent the warning.
> >
> > Can you explain some more please - what do you mean by " interferenced
> > formal parameter", I don't see any warnings with either vc6 or vc7b2.
> 
> I assume he means "unused parameter"; in the BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATES 
> version of the test_proc function template, the "i" parameter.

This is correct.  I don't know how I mangled "unreferenced" into "interreferenced".  Sorry about that.  I should also have mentioned that I ran the test in both debug and release mode at warning level 4, but with a boilerplate test.cpp file that turned off all the non-valuable warnings and then #included config_test.cpp.