Re: operators.hpp issue

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-10-31 11:31:12

on 10/29/01 2:40 PM, Helmut at helmut.zeisel_at_[hidden] wrote:

> --- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_r...> wrote:
>> I want to make use of your contribution, but have been very busy with other
>> things. I have a favor to ask: would you kindly integrate your changes with
>> the contents of http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/dlw_oprs2.zip and
>> send me the patch so that I have only one set of changes to review?
> 
> I merged
> 
> dlw_opers2.zip,
> operators_test.zip,
> operators_4.zip
> 
> and made the changes suggested in
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/message/16941
> 
> The result is in
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/big_int/operators_5.zip
> 
>> Please look at Daryle's work quickly
> 
> From a quick check I can say that the changes look reasonable to me. Using the
> merged version, operators_test and my big_int class work on VC++ 6.0,
> cygwin/GCC 2.95.3, and Linux/GCC 3.0.1.
> 
> Daryle, please can you check whether I really integrated your work correctly.
> Maybe you could also check operators_test.cpp on your Mac.

You did the integration OK.  I took your work and applied a few tweaks and
uploaded it as the latest version of dlw_oprs2.zip.  The tests ran OK on my
computer.

>> If this is OK with you, I'll take a quick look over the resulting changes and
>> integrate them this week.
>> 
> 
> OK. As I said in 
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/message/16922
> 
> if you would like to improve the language of my part of the documentation,
> feel free to do so.

I also did a slight rewording of the documentation, plus some HTML fixes.

-- 
Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT mac DOT com