From: Vesa Karvonen (vesa.karvonen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-02 14:55:08
From: "Jens Maurer" <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
> See attached. Looks like EDG should rework the preprocessor.
If I'm reading the results correctly, then there is a 500x difference between
the fastest and slowest on the preprocessor library test. One thing is sure.
It is possible to make a fast preprocessor.
> Do we want to publish the results on the web page?
I think that it would do good for some compiler vendors to profile their
I also think that compiling time is an important quality of implementation
issue. This goes for both compiler vendors _and_ library authors.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk