Re: [boost] Proposed metaprogramming type system

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-18 08:45:19

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>

> > David Abrahams wrote:

> > > Maybe we should be willing to consider a system where we write
> > >
> > > select_type::call<value, T, F>::type
> > >
> > > Consistency might be worth the extra typing.
>
> I don't quite understand what you mean here. Could you please describe
your
> proposed naming convention in more detail?

Sorry to be unclear. The point was to eliminate the need for one level of
naming convention by making all metafunctions "quoted".

BTW, I have no real problem with ct_if once you know what ct means, but when
we get to ct_p... and ct_vq... I think we're  in the domain of cryptography
;-)

-Dave