Re: Unit Test Framework: Class Test Cases

From: rogeeff (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-21 13:42:35

--- In boost_at_y..., "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_g...> wrote:
> 
[...]

> > Though the problem seems to be pretty generic and worth adding to 
the
> > base implementation. I could add an ability for the user to 
specify a
> > ninstance of user test case as an optional argument to
> > BOOST_TEST_CASE like this:
> >
> > BOOST_TEST_CASE(( &A::foo )); // here framework will create an
> > instance
> >
> > A* a = new A(...)
> > BOOST_TEST_CASE(( &A::foo, a )); // here framework will use the
> > instance provided and DESTROY it at the end.
> >
> > How about this?
> >
> Yes, this is exactly what I would like to have.
> 
> BTW, I already add that to my copy.
> 
> In order to allow A not to need a default constructor that is 
probably never

[...]

No need to introduce any new classes. Just add UserTestCase* argument 
to user_test_case_holder and class_test_case constructors and that is 
it. Plus change a bit logic in user_test_case_holder::init(). I will 
do it soon.

[...]

> But the 'closure' class might be tricky to get right, so if
> 
> > BOOST_TEST_CASE(( &A::foo, a )); // here framework will use the
> 
> can be parsed correctly it is probably better.

I will use closure internally. I want to provide a simplies interface 
possible.

> 
> 
> Fernando Cacciola
> Sierra s.r.l.
> fcacciola_at_g...
> www.gosierra.com

Gennadiy.