Re: ublas: reference_type etc.

From: jhrwalter (walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-17 09:55:32

--- In boost_at_y..., Kresimir Fresl <fresl_at_g...> wrote:
> Why ublas uses `non-standard' names `reference_type',
> `const_reference_type', `pointer_type' and `const_pointer_type'
> instead of almost standard `reference', `const_reference',
> `pointer' and `const_pointer'?
> 
> fres

To differentiate types and variables ;-) It's time to change them to 
standard conforming names.

Thanks for spotting this.

Regards

Joerg