From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-01 12:27:43
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> >I want to request a formal review. The library isn't that
> complicated. It
> >uses macros; I tried a template-based alternative, but my compiler
> >accept value-based template parameters that are pointers-to-member, and
> >library is too small to risk the heavy weight libraries like Bind.
> Without even looking at the library, I've really got a problem with basing
> design decisions on a compiler that is way out-of-date.
> Daryle, I'm assuming you are still using Metrowerks 5.3. Correct me if I'm
> wrong, but Metrowerks has released something like four releases since
> You really need to bite the bullet and buy or upgrade to a more modern
> system. Whether it is a Mac, Windows, or Linux box, it will let you
> develop more modern libraries.
> What do others think?
We could review it, but I would vote against accepting it on the basis that
it uses macros where even a two-releases-old version of the same compiler
wouldn't need them. I suspect many would react similarly, so we should
consider whether reviewing it is worthwhile.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk