From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-02-13 13:32:34
----- Original Message -----
From: "rogeeff" <rogeeff_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:16 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: properties in C++
> --- In boost_at_y..., "Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_g...> wrote:
> > > Mostly it helps developer not the user.
> > >
> > > Gennadiy
> > >
> > >
> > How exactly?
> > Fernando Cacciola
> > Sierra s.r.l.
> > fcacciola_at_g...
> > www.gosierra.com
> No need to write access functions
Ah! You were referring to the macro-based property framework that you used
in the Unit Test Library.
Well, that's a whole different story!
I have my religious reservations about things like BOOST_READONLY_PROPERTY
being a macro, but there's no point discussing this.
All my statements referred to macro-less solutions, like the one proposed by
This includes the statement that I'm interested in looking at a new
approach. Unfortunately, requiring explicit runtime binding (storing *this
somehow inside the properties explicitly) isn't new, so I'm not sure I like
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk