Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-11 11:32:42

Next message: vesa_karvonen: "Re: move to mailman"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "move to mailman"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] POD & constructor"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] POD & constructor"

euh, could anyone recall for me where it says in the standard it says that a
POD can't have a constructor defined (an argument used in the complex
std::complex ;) discussion)

Looking at claus 9, 4th paragraph, it does not mention the constructor ?

(think I'm tmp experiencing some blackout ;-(

Next message: vesa_karvonen: "Re: move to mailman"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "move to mailman"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] POD & constructor"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] POD & constructor"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk