Re: [boost] Re: Review: lambda library

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-18 15:38:38

At 11:55 AM 3/18/2002, Jaakko Jarvi wrote:

 >> it's only that this epic scope could prevent lambda
 >> from
 >> > being added to the standard library.
 >
 >Agreed, BLL exception handling etc. are probably not features I'd
 >suggest to be added to the standard library. For standard library,
 >some branches would obviously get chopped away - for boost, I think
 >it's ok to have a richer set of features.

That's true, but even on Boost a somewhat bloated library will turn off 
some users.  (That's just a general comment, not a specific opinion that 
you should remove anything from the lambda library.)

--Beman