From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-20 12:44:14
I did some more thinking about that this morning, including reading the
relevant part of the standard. It seems to me that we're still missing
some very important predicates which we could get from a legality
checker, like is_copyable<T>.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Hinnant" <hinnant_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] is_class
> On Wednesday, March 20, 2002, at 01:57 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> > I wonder if this gives Howard his general "tell me if this
> > construct compiles or not" compile-time check?
> I believe it goes a long way towards it. This is extraordinary code.
> I'm still trying to sort out the ramifications...
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk