Re: [boost] Review: lambda library

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-03-21 20:29:30

I would assume that is depends on compiler, so it should be the part of performance test module.

Gennadiy.

P.S. Could someone clyrify for me again what are the features of Phoenix that LL lacks, and how important are thay? Could they be added as extentions to LL?

--- Jaakko Jarvi <jajarvi_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Would also be interesting to see the numbers for 
>> int foo( int x ) { return x*x; }
>
>Don't have the figures here now, but for 
>class foo2 {
>  double operator()(const double& d)
>  { return d*d; }
>}
>class foo3 {
>  double operator()(const double& d)
>  { return d*d*d; }
>}
>
>...
>
>it goes pretty much hand in hand with lambda.
>
>Jaakko
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

_____________________________________________________________
A free email account your friends will never forget!
Get YOURNAME_at_[hidden]  at http://www.emailaccount.com/

_____________________________________________________________
Run a small business? Then you need professional email like you_at_[hidden] from Everyone.net  http://www.everyone.net?tag