[boost] Re: Re: Intrusive smart pointer

From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-25 01:26:22

"Fernando Cacciola" <fcacciola_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Still, one single case is enough... I think that this problem in
itself
> worth a separate intrusive_ptr<>.

I'd argue in favor of less proliferation of all sorts of smart
pointers, for obvious vested interest reasons :o).

Andrei