From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-05-01 15:27:50
"Greg Colvin" <greg_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> At 12:21 AM 05/01/2002, Andrei wrote:
> >> What does that cost the user?
> >> Binary compatibility.
> >Only both a) policy based smart pointers together with
> >b) one standard way to define and use a default smart pointer
> >for a specific type will be an acceptable solution.
I didn't write that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk