From: Paul A. Bristow (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-25 04:45:24
I have now run all the uBLAS tests 1 to 6 in release as well as debug mode.
I slightly suspect that using pre-compiled headers causes the compiler heap
overflow C1060 with test6. There is certainly something very funny about
the setting. I now think that rebuild/clean causes a compiler reset so the
heap is cleared.
Smells like a memory leak in the compiler? Surely not!
/Zm1000 IS sufficient for my tests. I only have 256Mbyte memory (Windows
Dr Paul A Bristow, hetp Chromatography
LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830
Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]On Behalf Of Martin Schuerch
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:41 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Problems with uBLAS and /Zm Option (VC7)
> I tried to run the test programs of ublas under VC7. I used the converted
> workspace from the workspace of VC6.
> -> Compiler errors due memory limitations (1GB installed).
> The suggestion of the online help is to set a bigger number in the /Zm
> In the included projects a number of 1000 (2000 is maximum) is
> already set.
> Increasing the number doesn't help.
> Deleting the already set option does help for most test-files.
> For the other
> files a number of 500 will succeed.
> I would like to replace our home made matrix class with the uBLAS one
> (during the review). But have a little bit a bad feeling, because
> I wouldn't
> like to play around with the /Zm option in every file.
> Has anybody experience with this?
> Best regards
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk