Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-26 07:43:51

Next message: Simon J. Julier: "Re: [boost] uBLAS gcc performance question"
Previous message: Dylan Cuthbert: "[boost] Re: Re: boost :: mpl timeline? (Macros a necessary evil,#redefand non-lazy evaluation, BOOST_PP_INC etc)"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"

From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>

> I guess the right thing to do is to document 'get_pointer(px)' as returng
> the raw pointer contained in px on the smart pointer side, and make
> mem_fn_get_pointer forward to it on the mem_fn side. Comments?

Do we need two separate functions?

-Dave

Next message: Simon J. Julier: "Re: [boost] uBLAS gcc performance question"
Previous message: Dylan Cuthbert: "[boost] Re: Re: boost :: mpl timeline? (Macros a necessary evil,#redefand non-lazy evaluation, BOOST_PP_INC etc)"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk