Re: [boost] Re: stlport config patch and ???-stlport.jam tools

From: John Maddock (john_maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-13 06:00:19

> You are right. config_test is failing. But, maybe we should use different
guard macro then? Something like BOOST_NO_STD_ALLOCATOR_REBIND?
>
> Cause AFAIK allocator widely used ever without rebind. And this facility
is usefull with sunpro compiler. Particularly Boost.Function would work.

Sorry for letting this one slip, I'll add BOOST_HAS_PARTIAL_STD_ALLOCATOR
when std::allocator is at least partially supported, will hopefully be all
plumbed in in a couple of days...

John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm