Re: [boost] request for comment on possible submission to library

From: spamjunk (spamjunk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-19 21:14:03

I'm sorry; I didn't ignore you.   I replied to three messages in succession,
before I got your first admonishment.  I will make sure to use plain text.

Rich

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Cc: <davidb_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] request for comment on possible submission to library

> Please stick to plain text emails, as requested in an earlier message
>
> Thank you,
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Moderator
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>            David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
> dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Bergman" <davidb_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 8:16 PM
> Subject: RE: [boost] request for comment on possible submission to library
>
>
> > The "algebraic" side of me definitely likes the operators "+" and "*". I
> > vote for those, but consider it to be quite important not to have both
> > sets, i.e., that you decide to go with either the "algebraic" or
> > "boolean" side.
> >
> > /David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>