[boost] Re: [smart_ptr] const-correctness as function argument

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-02 13:13:13

"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:055901c26a04$66823d20$6701a8c0_at_boostconsulting.com...
> [...]
> Why is everyone barking up this tree instead of using shared_ptr<T const>
> "as god intended"?

Because we're lazy, of course.  Isn't that the whole point of programming?
;)

Dave