Re: [boost] any interest in a 'tree' container?

From: Mattias Flodin (flodin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-10 11:03:36

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:57:14PM +0200, Kasper Peeters wrote:
> > What advantages does this library have over Boost.Graph?
> 
> So in short: the tree library is much simpler than the graph library,
> both in implementation and (most importantly) in usage. The tree
> concept is a lot simpler to understand for most people than the graph
> concept.

Right -- I've looked at the examples on your web pages and it does
indeed seem much simpler. I like it.

I'm not sure if the GPL license is "free" enough to meet the boost
license requirements though.

-- 
Mattias Flodin <flodin_at_[hidden]>  -  http://www.cs.umu.se/~flodin/
Room NADV 102
Department of Computing Science
Umeå University
S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
--
"In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by
everyone, something that no one ever knew before.  But in poetry, it's the
exact opposite. " -- Paul Dirac