Re: [boost] Formal Review: The Spirit Parser Framework.

From: Dan Nuffer (dnuffer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-20 23:16:04

Carl Daniel wrote:

  > I'm less convinced about illegal_backtracking - I accept your
argument that
  > it's intended to be an independent component and so shouldn't derive 
from
  > parse_error_base, but perhaps it should derive from std::exception.
  >

I agree.  This is now fixed.

  > fixed_size_queue should do _something_.  At the very least, it should
  > contain assert(false) in the places where a full queue is detected.
  >

You're right.  I changed it to use SPIRIT_ASSERT, which defaults to
assert if you don't customize it.

Thanks,
Dan