[boost] Re: C++ committee Library TR progress in Santa Cruz

From: James Curran/MVP (jamescurran_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-31 14:31:36

"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:4.3.2.7.2.20021027093453.00c75820_at_mailhost.esva.net...
> Doug Gregor, Jaakko Jarvi, and Gary Powell were at the meeting, and worked
> until 3 AM revising and syncing their proposals. These revisions were
> accepted by the LWG, and then the full committee, so function object
> wrappers and tuples became the first libraries formally accepted for the
> Library TR. Congratulations!

    Forgive me if this subject was dealt with elsewhere.....

    I assume that this now means that these classes should be defined in the
std:: namespace.  What effect does that have on Boost?    Should their
reference versions here be moved into std:: or kept in boost::?  If we move
them to std::, must they be frozen to exactly match what's in the TR, or it
further development possible on them?

--
Truth,
James Curran
www.NovelTheory.com  (Personal)
www.NJTheater.com   (Professional)
www.aurora-inc.com   (Day job)