From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-08 01:50:57
"Terje Slettebø" <tslettebo_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Sure, that would be fine. I'm not that familiar with Boost.PP, though,
> so I think I leave it to someone else to write that version. As quite a
> bit of code uses yes_type/no_type, now, it may be a good idea to keep
> them, as well, anyway, for backwards compatibility and simplicity.
Using the PP lib seems like overkill to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk