[boost] Re: Small thing: yes_type and no_type made public?

From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-10 12:04:21

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:02:33 +0100, Terje Slettebø
<tslettebo_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>Even then, you're not home and dry. Kevlin Henney has mentioned that names
>ending with "_t" are reserved by POSIX, so they shouldn't be used in
>non-implementation code.

Probably they realized that this was an enormous meddling though. At
least so it seems if you compare the first table, and the immediately
preceding text, in

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/compilation.html

with the corresponding part in

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/xsh_chap02_02.html

Genny.