Re: [boost] Re: Patch for BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT docs - config-patch.txt

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-28 18:25:20

Gennaro Prota <gennaro_prota_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Sun, 26 Jan 2003 12:33:38 -0500, David Abrahams
> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Shouldn't we stick the -b- option in our borland toolset, since it
>>increases conformance?
>
> Personally I would prefer that, yes (not for BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT
> though, as I said in the other post). The important thing to consider
> is that -b- may change the size of enums, and thus affects binary
> compatibility. I don't know if that's really a problem for any of
> Python, Regex, and Threads.

Done.

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution