From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-05 09:50:45
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:32 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Daniel Frey <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Pavel Vasiliev wrote:
> > Conclusion: IMO, policy-based implementations like Loki::SmartPtr<>
> > and "fixed" ones like boost::shared_ptr<T> or my refc_ptr<T> serve
> > different needs. Do I say something new? Hardly.
> "Premature optimization is the root of all evil"
> "Premature flexibility is the root of all evil"
> Stone me, Andrei :o)
I don't think it's premature. There's certainly plenty of evidence by now
that people want a variety of different smart pointers.
I still have some questions which haven't been satisfied about how to get
there, of course...
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk