From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-08 04:06:02
Gennaro Prota wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 06:05:23 -0600, Aleksey Gurtovoy
> <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > It has 'next'/'prior' members because it's the easiest/most
> > efficient way to implement 'next/prior< integral_c<T,n> >::type'
> > functionality on compilers that don't support partial template
> > specialization.
> However, if we agree that when having autonomous next/prior we will
> only use them to access next/prior< .. >::type and that the user
> *must* specialize them for everything else
Nope, we don't. This should work out-of-box:
typedef /* unspecified */ next;
typedef mpl::next<her_iterator>::type t;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk