From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-19 10:41:59
I'd be happy to help out with the regression tests but currently when I get
everything from the CVS repository, then simply tell it to:
bjam "-sTOOLS=vc7 msvc vc71" >bjam.log
I get 32 things which fail:
...failed updating 36 targets...
...skipped 36 targets...
...updated 852 targets...
from the most recent run (8 hours ago).
all of the errors seem to be triggered by this:
cpp_main.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "int __cdecl
cpp_main(int,char * * const)" (?cpp_main@@YAHHQAPAD_at_Z) referenced in
function "public: virtual int __thiscall `anonymous
: fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
Any suggestions on fixing this would be helpful, and then what do I do to
actually run the regressions tests?
At Sunday 2003/02/16 06:15, you wrote:
>At 11:21 PM 2/15/2003, Carl Daniel wrote:
> >"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> >> This morning's Win32 regression tests have been posted. Looking at the
> >> diff, http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-diff.html,
> >> there are still some worries:
> >An aside -
> >Since 1.30.0 will likely be the Boost version when MSVC 7.1 ("Everett")
> >ships, it would be nice to have VC7.1 regression results. I can
> >understand perhaps not posting 7.1 results until the RTM version is
> >available, but is anyone even running the regression tests on the "final
> >beta" (build 2292) or "RC1" (build 2346) versions regularly?
>I considered that briefly, but decided not to pursue it for several reasons.
>The Win32 regression testing is already sucking up too much of my time and
>my computer's time. Every added compiler makes that worse. And changing
>the setup so close to the Boost release doesn't seem smart to me. The
>Boost policy not to test betas is probably a good one, too.
>I'll add VC++ 7.1 as soon as possible once I get a release copy, but have
>no idea when that will be.
>However, if you wanted to start running VC++ 7.1 regression tests now, and
>posting them as a separate set of tables, that would be fine with me.
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk