From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-03 03:04:28
> If the issue concerns you this much, you might propose something along the
> lines of BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS.
> That is, you might try: "BOOST_NO_RTTI anyone?"
> - Eric
I did. As a user defined parameter. Terrie made a point that it should be
config parameter cause some embedded compiler indeed does not provide this
functionally (maybe because it's taking too much space to implement?). No
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk