From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-16 07:35:42
> Sure. It's actually a patch for is_enum.hpp but it fixes warnings for
> both is_class and is_enum, namely:
> test::is_class< int( int ) >::value
> test::is_enum< int( int ) >::value
> I added the fix globally, but if you prefer to remove the dependency to
> is_function for other compilers, you can add a guard.
Yes, I made it gcc specific, also added a similar fix for is_union, but not
for has_trivial_copy which also produces these warnings. Fixes will be in
cvs towards the weekend - when I get my cvs access up again (I only have
limited mail access at present).
> Also, IIRC, the comment from Dave seen below is lying (due to changes
> that happened after he wrote it). Maybe we should fix this up, too. It
> would IMHO lead to the removal of the #ifdef-block, but I didn't wanted
> to mix it up with the fix for the warnings, so I left it out for now.
Not quite - the fix is required if you can't pass non-copyable types through
is_convertible, and that is still true for some compilers unfortunately,
even if this has been fixed for most of them...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk