[boost] Re: Re: Re: is_convertible: rationale and wording

From: Mike Conley (conley.141_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-04-26 20:39:04

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in
news:uhe8k7r1i.fsf_at_[hidden]: 

> Further, suppose I write a metafunction:
> 
>         template <class T>
>         struct is_const_and_int_convertible
>            : and_<
>                  is_const<T>
>                , is_convertible<T,int>
>              >
>          {};
> 
> Does this one depend on context also?

Yes.  But don't we have this problem with the template version, too?

-- 
Mike Conley