From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-01 21:50:04
Beman Dawes wrote:
> * Do TR components need a formal review?
> Some kind of review is needed to ensure quality, but the process
> should be simplified compared to a normal formal review. Details
> need to be worked out.
As alluded to by Beman, there was a previous discussion between me,
Doug, Dave and Jaakko. There's an implementation of the TR compliant
version of the tuple library written by Jaakko and me a few months ago.
Right now, it is still in the Spirit CVS. Some of us would like to have it
in boost's CVS in the tuple directory. I asked for a go signal. So far,
Dave, Jaakko and Doug gave it a go. If a formal review is required, I
guess I can't proceed yet at this point?
I await your comments regarding this matter.
-- Joel de Guzman joel at boost-consulting.com http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk