Re: [boost] Re: smart assert library comments

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-22 07:19:08

John Torjo wrote:
>> 3. In addition to __FUNCTION_ GCC has __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ and C99
>> __func__ (I think). Other platforms may have their own (like
>> __function__). 
> 
> Thanks!
> Basically, I would be interested in all of these unportable macros.
> The more the merrier, since the more information we can supply about a
> failed assertion, the better!
> 
> If anyone has knowledge about these, please let me know. Thanks.

See boost/current_function.hpp.