Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-03 05:58:20


Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I just did an intel-win32 clean and then limits_test. It compiled, linked,
> and ran without error.

That's greate but doesn't tell me very much. It's just one test (with
one version?) of the compiler.

> >What does it mean that intel5,6 still report
> >BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP? I don't know what to do with
> >this information.
>
> Because # define BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP is (or was, until I
> removed it) hardwired into intel.hpp when used with msvc?

I don't know; what does config_test say now?
I would think that config_test would not use the Boost config, but
then maybe I don't understand its purpose.

> Be careful about making changes at this point. AFAICS, the
> intel-win32-tools.jam and intel.hpp stuff is working far better than
> it ever has.

I'm not planning on doing anything else to it.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk