From: E. Gladyshev (egladysh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-05 17:29:15
--- Bohdan <gejrlaug_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> If you mean your threads snipped: Yes i've seen it.
> IMO it is more complicated and YES it has compile
> time problems, unless you put traits implementation
> in cpp files and move #include <OS headers> to
> cpp files, but in this case you have
Yes, it was my suggestion. I have put traits
implemenations in cpp file in my proposal. #include
<OS headers> are in cpp files as well. Sorry if my
description was not clear. I hope you agree that in
this case, there are not any performance issues?
> link-to-correct-library problems again.
We have it anyway. My solution didn't claim to resolve
it completely, did it? However if I use thread_core.h
directly and provide my own trait (my toy OS), it
resolves the link-to-correct-library problems
automatically, does it?
> Let me guess ... part of application is using
> and part is woring as always in main thread ?
> "Models" term was wrong, sorry.
> Under models i meant REALLY diffrent functionality
> for threads. Like ToyOSThreads and Win32threads.
> More correct is "Thread Implementation".
Win32 has really different thread models. I have
mentioned it several times in my posts. They have
normal threads and fibers, do they?
> I'm still trying. Hope you too.
same here :)
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk