Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daryle Walker (dwalker07_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-09 00:48:17


On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 2:25 PM, David B. Held wrote:

> "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:4.3.2.7.2.20030808083928.025bf070_at_mailhost.esva.net...
>> At 07:30 PM 8/6/2003, Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> [...]
>>> And don't forget the Mac ;-)
>>
>> [...]
>> I know that Windows and X Window are major API's that follow very
>> different flow-of-control models. Is the Mac sufficiently different
>> to be an important proof-of-concept case? Are there others?
>
> I think Joel was mostly tongue-in-cheek there. When talking about the
> Mac, you have OS X and pre-OS X. Personally, I think supporting
> pre-OS X is about important as supporting VC6 for the next ten
> years...doable, but maybe not the best investment of time and
> resources. Pre-OS X can barely be considered modern operating
> systems, which is why OS X has the mach kernel. Since OS X uses X for
> the GUI, I think it's covered by "Windows and X".

Yikes!! The "X" in "Mac OS X" has NOTHING to do with X-Windows! (The
Mac's "X" is for the Roman numeral for "ten".) Macs use an independent
GUI API. But, like Windows, there are programs that allow X-Windows
programs to work on Macs.

Daryle


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk