Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-11 16:52:11


Martin Wille <mw8329_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> In that case, can I release 1.30.2? I don't like having the 1.30.1
>> debacle hanging over my head.
>
>
> There are new regressions on Linux (RC_1_30_0 branch):
> http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux-rc-1_30_0/developer_summary_page.html
>
>
> crc has regressions for gcc-3.1 and gcc-3.2.3
> config, format and io have regressions for intel 7.1

According to your chart, the following libraries are all regressing:

  config
  crc
  date_time
  format
  function
  graph
  io
  math
  multi_array
  numeric/interval
  numeric/ublas
  optional
  random
  static_assert
  test
  type_traits
  utility

Are these real regressions or just newly-tested compilers? Can the
library authors/maintainers address these problems? Where is our
maintenance wizard?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk