Boost logo

Boost :

From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-14 15:24:01


David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:uekzooxw3.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
> "Fernando Cacciola" <fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > The page is: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html
> > So it should correspond to the HEAD revision.
> > IIUC, the HEAD revision contains Jen's broken patch, so this one should fail.
>
> I am only concerned with RC_1_30_0 here.
>
I see.

> > I think that the correct patch is to revert Jens' fix.
> > (go back to revision 1.9).
> >
> > Can you and others run a quick test to see if this fix is correct?
>
> RC_1_30_0 already works with GCC-3.2 work for me.
>
I see.
I wonder what would happen with gcc3.3 and 3.3.1 without Jen's patch.

Should I revert that anyway, even if it leaves those compilers unsupported?

> I checked in this
> patch to fix vc6/7:
>
Great.

Fernando Cacciola


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk